Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · CHAMPLAINChamplain

A new route.Know the details.

A hypothetical Trois-Rivières household is comparing an individual Gold Card application with an employer’s corporate proposal. Compare the named applicant, sponsor, family members and current official payment structure. An employer’s total relocation allowance is not a substitute for those program terms. The key decision is whether the proposal fits the official individual or corporate structure and whether the named people can meet the separate immigration requirements. Funding conversations should follow that analysis, not replace it. A careful review therefore tests the official procedure at the time of action and preserves the applicant’s independent immigration evidence. It avoids treating a private budget approval as the government instruction, category determination or authorization needed for the planned move.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026
01

Use the published individual and corporate amounts

The official FAQ checked September 7, 2026 states a nonrefundable US$15,000 DHS processing fee per applicant. After successful vetting, the gift is US$1 million for an individual principal or US$2 million per corporate-sponsored employee. Each eligible joining spouse or unmarried child under 21 has an additional US$15,000 fee and US$1 million gift, including in a corporate application. Additional State Department or medical-examination costs may apply. Prepare a person-by-person schedule identifying the official charge, the prospective payer and the point at which a payment is due. This distinguishes household planning from an unsupported assumption that one sponsor payment covers everyone.

02

Read the sponsor’s continuing terms

The corporate FAQ describes a 1% annual maintenance fee and a 5% transfer fee including a new DHS background check. It describes using a prior employee’s gift contribution as the basis for sponsoring a new employee without another US$2 million gift. That is not automatic approval for a replacement person. Review the current official procedure and the private employment agreement separately before relying on a sponsor-change assumption. Treat any corporate replacement discussion as a current-procedure question, supported by official instructions and the employer’s own agreement. It should not be reduced to an accounting entry or a promise that a successor will qualify.

03

Separate payment from the immigration decision

The official sequence involves the processing fee, vetting and a government gift after successful vetting. Successful cases use EB-1 or EB-2, subject to category eligibility, admissibility and visa availability. The gift is not EB-5 capital invested for commercial return. Neither an employer promise nor payment itself establishes permanent residence, work authorization or citizenship. Keep the government payment, the immigration category analysis and any employment commitment in separate columns. That separation makes clear why a payment by the applicant to the U.S. government is not a conventional visa application or an investment for return.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · CHAMPLAIN

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.